Techniques That Harmful For Website
5 Techniques That May Be Harmful For Website
A customary issue that arises in these days during website development and execution is that one company watches another company doing something they like and they announce it “GOOD”. Then that company copies the first company’s website and then other companies announce it “GOOD” and copy that company and so on until and unless we have a plethora of badly designed, coded or implemented websites that are a terrible experience for customers and an even dreadful one for SEO valuations. These website issues generally lie into about 5 main categories. So what are the most confused website design and layout techniques that could be dangerous for your site, or your business in context of traffic and website positioning?
Endless Scroll (Infinite)
While no technique is genetically bad, this method of designing is one of the most hackneyed and confused design techniques on the Web world today. While honestly useful for definite specific user purpose, many websites utilize it with the plan that it helps website arrangement because visitors don’t have to click. Just provide them a stream so that they will be happy. However, if a user desires to stream that outstanding content is contingent on the use case. Moreover that use case is superiorly specific and scarcely focused. In fact, when used inappropriately it can potentially injure your website especially in terms of usability, SEO and conversion optimization.
Lazy Loading is the recent in a not-so-short list of fabricated solutions that cannot be perfectly monitored by Google for content indexing. Lazy Loading is occurred when the next part of the page, either it is image or content, does not upload until you cooperate with that part of the page in a manner that boot-up the object in that page to load (example: your content is not noticeable until you scroll to that part of the page, then it materialize). This ensures that your content or images will not be catalogue by Google if they are under the load point because Google spiders will not attempt to communicate with your script and load the remaining part of the page. After all you’re content or images are not fully uploaded and factually not visible to the spider, only the noticeable part of the page will be indexed.
This issue can injure your website in context with online traffic for say Google image search or reduction by the Google algorithms for small content, as you do not have sufficient index point available to pass summon.
Parallax when it is done pretty well can be cool. Regrettably it is rarely used in the right context or for the accurate reasons. This also goes for pages that emulate Parallax. Parallax scrolling is a process where background images proceed by the camera easy than foreground images, making a phantasm of depth. On sites this is occurred when the background and foreground creates the phantasm of motion. Also capture from this idea is the pages that are separated into various sections as you proceed down the page with scrolling motions.
This system of Web page design is fraught with execution and SEO matters that all needed workarounds including one URL and incapacity to search content easily. In addition, it is a very annoying user experience to have to “stop on a mark” when seeing the content. If you are not able to give a fluid Parallax experience that makes worth to the customer as they go through your website and it is true that you have wasted useful time and hard-work for making it work just for a little welfare.
If your website is not mobile-friendly, stop doing anything right now and go make a scheme to get it there. This is one of that Who Approach to (Insert person here) period of time in your website’s life that if you depend on organic search traffic (or even Facebook) has to be fixed or you will duck your traffic. Disappearance of traffic directly means depletion of money, then jobs and then we all aware how it goes, so let’s not imagine past that. Over the past couple of years, Google has been very straight-forward that websites require to start taking mobile account into consideration. On 24 Jan, it even allow a mobile algorithm that commenced removing websites from mobile search for not being mobile-friendly. If your website does not appear to be mobile-friendly then it implies that “responsive,” “adaptive,” or “responsive/adaptive,” and in mobile search you do not watch the words “mobile-friendly” next to your listing, you will misplace some or all of your rank in Google SERPs, if it crook to its guns.
It has become ordinary to eliminate all menus and load in a “hamburger menu” or websites that are not being exhibit in mobile. While mobile users have become more habitual with this type of menu on their desktops as you are walloping what the user can get on your website and adding a click. Neither of these is obligatory and in the end can create user a doubt. Where it might be relevant in a tools menu where the user is searching let’s say for the mission statement, about us, or a page functionality. Applicable studies do reflect us that if you want to achieve maximum clarity for those using your mobile website, please add a good border and the attractive word menu to your hamburger symbol. It helps users to grasp up “scent information scent” more speedily.